SYLLABUS for Summer II, 2017: July 10-Aug. 9
Ger 312: War, Death, and the Hero in Medieval Literature: Beowulf, Nibelungenlied, Roland, Njal’s Saga, and El Poema de Mío Cid
THIS COURSE WILL BE OFFERED AS AN ONLINE COURSE IN SUMMER II, 2017, IN A CONDENSED FORM
This course can count toward the Cultural Minor in German Studies or toward the THEMATIC MINOR IN MEDIEVAL STUDIES. It is also a TIER 2 course, open to students across campus.
It addresses pan-European heroic epics, including examples from Old English, Old and Middle High German, Old French, Old Spanish, and Old Icelandic. The question we will address concerns the issue of heroism, war, death, and how the individual protagonist handles questions regarding honor, God, respect, happiness, and death.
INSTRUCTOR: Prof. Albrecht Classen, Dept. of German Studies, 301 Learning Services Building, Office 318; tel. 621-1395; firstname.lastname@example.org; aclassen.faculty.arizona.edu/
OFFICE HOURS: Mo and We 11a.m.-12 p.m., and any other time after appointment (but always feel free simply to stop by at my office, email me, call me to make sure that I am in). For the online course, all this has to happen through email: email@example.com
CLASSROOM: tba (online course won't need a classroom)
COURSE OBJECTIVES: Introduce students to four of the most important European/German heroic epics and to challenge them in their thinking about war and death, and the role of the hero. We will discuss these epics together and probe different perspectives and interpretations. Students will become familiar with major epic poems and understand how much war and death have been with us for ever, forming part of human experience. Moreover, the readings of our epic poems will lead us automatically to a discussion of the role of the hero. Sometimes the hero emerges as an entirely positive figure, but in later texts we also discover negative features. A true hero is not simply a superman, god-like, but an individual who grows to the occasion and succeeds in overcoming his/her own weakness.
COURSE OUTCOME: Students will have gained a solid understanding of a major genre in medieval literature, which lays the foundation for many developments of similar texts in the modern age. They will have acquired the ability to analyze critically large epic poems and to write solid papers about them. They will have learned how to discuss the role of a hero and to examine critically epic poems that deal with war and death.
COURSE MATERIAL: 1. Old English Beowulf; 2. Middle High German Nibelungenlied; 3. Old French Chanson de Roland; 4. Old Spanish El Poema de Mío Cid. All texts available in solid and affordable paperbacks (Penguin), and available through the UA Bookstore. For the introduction and throughout, we will read shorter epic poems, such as the Old High German Hildebrandslied, the Wanderer, the Battle of Maldon, etc. These will be made available through D2L. For the online course I will reduce it to the four epic poems since they are long enough.
Although it is assumed that you will attend all class sessions, you are informed hereby that excessive absences will have consequences. For details see below in the grading section. If justified circumstances prevent you from attending, please inform me in writing either before or after the event, and provide satisfactory documentation (e.g., a doctor’s note). I will call out or post, at random, a group of students’ names to verify your attendance. So be forewarned. You need to come up to me and show me your Catcard at the end of class. Online course: we'll meet 12 times online in chatrooms. Attendance: If you attend most of the time (10-12 (A=10 pts), 8-9 (B = 9 pts), 6-7 (C = 8 pts), 4-5 (D = 7 pts), 2-3 (F = you failed this class; I understand that this is a big jump, but attendance is a requirement)
DISCUSSIONS, ACADEMIC BEHAVIOR, EXPECTATIONS:
Please treat each other with respect and tolerance. People do have different views and opinions, but all these can only contribute to the rich learning experience I hope you all will have in this class. You are strongly encouraged to participate in class as much as possible. The two class meetings per week will only be of profit for you if you respond to my questions and those of your classmates.
For information on the University of Arizona Policy on Threatening Behavior by Students, click on this link: http://policy.arizona.edu/education-and-student-affairs/threatening-behavior-students
CELL PHONES and all other electronic gadgets: You are not allowed to have your cell phones, smart phones, etc. on during class because a ringing will disturb everyone strongly. Either turn them off or mute them. All other electronic gadgets not pertinent to this class, such as iphone, ipads, etc., must also be off. They must all be put away. No playing around with texting, etc., openly or secretly. I need your full attention, and you are in class in order to learn and study, not to communicate with people on the outside. BTW, I will not have any of those gadget with me either and will be totally focused on you.
HONORS CONTRACTS: “Students who enter The Honors College as freshmen may fulfill up to 12 units (maximum 6 lower-division) through contracts. Students who enter the Honors College as sophomores may fulfill up to 9 units (maximum 3 lower-division) through contracts. Students who enter The Honors College as juniors may fulfill six Honors credits through contracts.” See also: “The work assigned as a result of the Contract should not determine the student's final grade. That is, the fact that the student is working for Honors credit does not guarantee a high grade. Final grades should reflect the quality and content of all of the student's work in the course.” (http://www.honors.arizona.edu/future-students/honors-credit-across-campus). The honors experience should involve not quantity but quality of further research, allowing a student in the Honors College taking this class to gain deeper and broader understanding of the class material. This might entail the study of some relevant research papers, which should result in an extra paper or oral presentation, or the study of additional material expanding the horizon as aimed for in this course.
SPECIAL NEEDS: Students with disabilities who require reasonable accommodations to participate fully in course activities or meet course requirements must register with the Disability Resource Center. http://drc.arizona.edu/instructors/syllabus-statement. Students need to submit appropriate documentation to the instructor if they are requesting reasonable accommodations.
If you use secondary material for your papers, make sure that you indicate clearly where you took it from. Plagiarism and cheating violate the Code of Academic Integrity. For further information, see:
Do not ever copy from the work produced by published authors, by your classmates, by other students who might have taken this course in previous semesters, or by yourself in a previous or parallel class. If you receive help in writing your papers, make sure that the final outcome still represents your own work. You can discuss your papers with your fellow students, but at the end they need to consist of your own ideas and words! Be advised that the Web is a great search tool, but never, never copy from there without identifying very clearly what you used (and then only sparingly). At this point the scholarly value of web-based material still is not totally reliable, and the chances that you might stumble upon a most dubious webpage with untrustworthy information are very high. When you quote from a secondary source, clearly identify the quote and tell the reader in a footnote where you quoted it from. Every year more than 800 students at the UA are caught having committed the crime of plagiarism, resulting in penalties that could be as severe as expulsion from the University! You are smart enough not to copy from other people.
If there is any doubt in your mind whether you might commit plagiarism, see:
Plagiarism and the Web
If you commit plagiarism, you could either receive a 0 on your specific assignment, or an F for the entire course. Depending on the gravity of the case, you might even be expelled from the University. Every plagiarism case must be reported to the head of my dept., to the head of your dept., and to the Dean of Students.
Help with writing: The Writing Skills Improvement Program offers a number of valuable workshops at 1201 E. Helen Street. Please consult with them if you have a need to improve your writing skills (no walk-ins). For perhaps more immediate help, see the Writing Center: http://thinktank.arizona.edu/tutoring/writing (walk-ins allowed). Tel.: 621-5849
Writing Center: The Writing Center is a free resource for UA undergraduate and graduate students as well as faculty and staff. At the Writing Center, a trained peer consultant will work individually with you on anything you're writing (in or out of class), at any point in the writing process from brainstorming to editing. Appointments are recommended, but not required. For more information or to make an appointment, visit their website at http://wsip.arizona.edu/, stop by at 1201 E Helen St., main level, or call (520) 626-0530.?
GRADING: (100 percent total):
1. Attendance: your attendance is a given; you will lose points, however, for excessive unexcused absences: 10-12 (A), 8-9 (B = - 3%), 6-7 (C = - 6%), 4-5 (D = - 8%), 2-3 (F = you failed this class; I understand that this is a big jump, but attendance is a requirement) = 10%. For the online course, there will be some flexibility as to the total meeting times.
2. 3 papers: 20%, 20%, 20% = 60%
3. 1 essay-based exam: 30%= 30%
Each paper will be graded as follows:
Must be typed, with at least 1" margin on all sides, at least 12 points letter size. Bring the print-out to class when paper is due. Submit also in electronic form to the Assigment box in D2L, though only the paper copy will count. Keep in mind that each paper will be automatically examined as to the degree of similarities with other papers (turnitin software!). When there is suspicion of plagiarism, I will call you in for a conference, and the consequences for plagiarism might be very harsh. Do not write your paper together with a classmate, though you can, of course, discuss the topics with him/her. If you copy from another paper/chapter/article in print or online, without acknowledging the author and without indicating the extent to which you have copied by means of quotation marks and references, you commit plagiarism.
For the online course, only Assignment submission!
Thesis: Concisely developed, clear concept, well formulated (avoid paraphrase!). Always provide a title that captures your thesis. 20 pts
Argument: Good use of original text to illustrate the thesis; complex argument based on a solid knowledge of the text; convincing organization. 50 pts. If you do not engage with at least one critical secondary source, loss of 15 points, if only fleetingly or superficially, loss of 10 points.
Conclusion: Convincing connection with the thesis, good summary of the argument, final comment on the outside source (negatively or positively), concise formulation; 20 pts.
Outside Sources: You must engage with at least one pertinent outside source for each paper, i.e., a critical study of recent vintage (preferably not from prior to 1970!). Bring in the author's opinion and use it either to support your own argument or demonstrate why you believe that the other opinion misreads the text. [does not apply to our online course]
Format: Write down your first last name, SI, class, instructor, term, year on the top of your paper. Next follows the title. Next the thesis in bold.
At the end of your paper write a statement and sign it that this is your own piece of work and that you did not receive outside help.
Stylistics: 10 pts: Correct use of grammar and diction, sophisticated use of vocabulary, complex sentence structure.
LENGTH: Each paper should consist of ca. 800-1000 words.
Always submit a hard copy and upload a version to the dropbox on D2L! You must do both (not for the online course)!
Bibliography: See, for instance, my Handbook of Medieval Studies, ed. A. C. (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2010; online in the library). Familiarize yourself with the various research sources in our library (MLA, JSTOr, etc.). Your outside sources ought to focus on the specific topic that you are addressing. The studies that you will consult cannot be from prior to 1960 (the older ones are not necessarily bad, but for learning experiences it is necessary for you to consult the latest research).
How to cite your secondary source/s :
Trumpener, Katie. "Memories Carved in Granite: Great War Memorials and Everyday Life." PMLA 115 (2000): 1096-103. - this is a journal article
Hanks, Patrick. "Do Word Meanings Exist?" Computers and the Humanities 34 (2000): 205-15. – this is a journal article
Kurlansky, Mark. Salt. A World (New York: Scribner's, 2001). - this is a monograph!
Niiranen, Susanna. “At the Crossroads of Religion, Magic, Science and Written Culture.” Mental Health, Spirituality, and Religion in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Age, ed. Albrecht Classen. Fundamentals of Medieval and Early Modern Culture, 15. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014. 290-313. – this is an article in an edited volume
"Selected Seventeenth-Century Events," Romantic Chronology. Ed. Laura Mandell and Alan Liu. 1999. U of California, Santa Barbara. 12 November 2003 <http://english.ucsb.edu:591/rchrono/>. (last accessed on Month, date, year) - this is an online source
You must use this format! Otherwise loss of points.
Week one (starts on July 10): historical background: Chatroom meeting 1, 8 p.m.
(Please just see the questions that I posted already in the chatroom)
Chatroom meeting 2: July 12, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 3: July 14, 8 p.m.
Read the article by Emily Amt and A. Classen (online)
Beowulf (we read the entire text)
Sat., July 15: 1st paper is due, 5 p.m.
Week two: Nibelungenlied. Sat., July 22: 2nd paper is due (we read only excerpts: chapters 1-20, 25, 27, 37-39)
Chatroom meeting 4: July 17 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 5: July 19, 8 p.m.
Week three: Chanson de Roland (we read excerpts
Chatroom meeting 6: July 24, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 7: July 26, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 8: July 28, 8 p.m.
Sat., July 29, 3rd paper is due 5 p.m.
Week four: El Poema de Mio Cid (we read the entire text): Fri: final exam is due (covers the entire course, including the historical survey).
Chatroom meeting 9: July 31, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 10: Aug. 2, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 11: Aug. 4, 8 p.m.
Chatroom meeting 12: Aug. 7, 12 p.m. (in preparation for the exam)
Aug. 9: Final exam due at 5 p.m. (essay questions; I'll post them a few days early)
Last day of class: Aug. 9
Regular semester syllabus:
Week 1: early and high Middle Ages (internal and external challenges), growth of medieval society, development of literature, the role of the Church
Week 2: late Middle Ages, transition to the Renaissance (epidemics, technological revolutions, discoveries, decline of the Church, reform)
Weeks 3: The hero, heroic poetry, oral poetry versus literacy (I’ll provide excerpts of theoretical material); research material specifically for Beowulf will be identified. This will provide the basis for the rest of the class: what characterizes heroic epics, when and where were they composed, in what language, how do we approach them today from a scholarly perspective (again, oral poetry, modern performances of Beowulf, for instance)
We also will start with Beowulf, chapters 1-8
Week 4: Beowulf: chapters 9-20
Week 5: Beowulf, chapters 21-43; paper one (20%) due by the end of week 5
Week 6: Nibelungenlied, chapters 1-10 (each chapter consists of ca. 4-8 pp.
Week 7: Nibelungenlied, chapters 11-28 (then we skip chapters 29-33)
Midterm exam: end of week 7 (20%): This will test your understanding of the historical-cultural background and your concepts about these two major heroic epics.
Grader will review your paper a second time only within 7 days after the original has been returned to you. Re-grading, of course, does not guarantee a better grade, although that is the goal based on improved quality. The second grade will be the only one that will count.
Week 8: Nibelungenlied, chapters 34-39
Week 9: Old French Roland: This consists of ca. 300 laisses, ca. 10 line stanzas. We will read laisses 1-110, exploring how the shining hero Roland is challenged by his father-in-law Genelon, and then faces his own hubris in fighting against the Muslims.
Week 10: Roland, laisses 111-200: Fall of the Paladins, calling back of Charlemagne
Week 11: Roland, laisses 201-298; paper two (20%) due by the end of week 11 (you can write either on Roland or on the Nibelungenlied)
Paper two can be rewritten after it has been graded; rewrite paper will be due one week after the first version has been returned. When you turn in your rewrite, you must include the following items or it will not be considered for a revised grade:
1. The original hard copy you submitted with the grader’s comments.
2. Your "new"/revised copy: Any and all revisions/edits MUST SHOW IN BOLD FONT. Yes, you need to staple your paper and include a proper heading (your name, student ID #, class name, Dr. Classen's name, date and word count)
3. Both items must be put in a folder and turned in at the start of class.
4. Revision must go beyond a few cosmetic changes and must reveal a thorough rewriting based on a critical re-evaluation of your thesis or arguments.
So, to review: In a folder, you submit 1) the original hard copy 2) your new, revised version with all revisions and edits in BOLD FONT. New version is stapled and has proper heading. Due date: tba
Week 12: El Poema de Mío Cid: Old Spanish heroic epic, 152 stanzas altogether, we will begin with a discussion of El Cid’s expulsion, exile, and early struggles for his honor: stanzas 1-60
Week 13: El Poema de Mío Cid: stanzas 61-100: success, victories, his daughters’ marriage, and the failure of the sons-in-law
Week 14: El Poema de Mío Cid: defeat of the opponents, public triumph, recognition by the king; paper three (20%) due by the end of week 14
Week 15: Brief excerpt from the Njal’s Saga (Old Icelandic saga): review of the concept of heroism and heroic literature, cumulative discussion of the course concepts: war, death, and the hero.
Third and final exam (20%; this will be comprehensive), date tba
Possible Changes: The information contained in the course syllabus, other than the grade and absence policies, may be subject to change with reasonable advance notice, as deemed appropriate by the instructor.
Final Grade Review: If there might be a problem with your grade, you can ask me for a review until: date to be determined (shortly before finals week is over). Beyond that, there will not be any opportunity to revisit your grade.